The Trade Relations Among Europe and Africa, Asia and America

Before 1500, Europeans had already established a profession cyberspace with Africa, Asia and America. The products that they traded during that time period included food clothing, weapons and other goods. Today their trading networks are very forward-looking and connect to every corner well to every other aspect of the planet. Trading became an essential opus for our society to function and prosperous into what it has wrick today. Some might think that todays trading landscape came from the Europeans nigh 1500, but they were just eager to establish trades with countries who were just as eager to purchase European goods.However, this statement is incorrect. The reality was that non every state was willing to purchase their products, but many a(prenominal) of the Europeans were eager to buy products from other countries. In this paper, I will show how the above statement and its flaws. European countries have a rich shade. For example, they have a wide variety of food, a hu ge order of battle of art work and a number of different customs inlcuding multiple languages. Their possession of these qualities made them become the modern civilization popular at that time.Therefore, if a country that was little civilized started using their products, that country might be modernized at a faster pace. Therefore, the Europeans were helping other countries when they traded with them. However, their good whole kit were non accepted by other countries. Not every country was implicated in European goods. For example, China resisted importing foreign goods to their country at that time. This was because the government did not want foreign burnish to affect their already rich civilization, as Chinas history could be traced back to 3000 long time ago.Also, African countries, although they were not civilized at all, were not receptive at buying European goods. Tribes from Africa were break up everywhere. Most of these tribes were self-sufficient as in their advanc ed ability to produce their own goods as rebut to trading products between tribes. As a result, the economy in Africa was very weak and none of these tribes could spread the European products in order to better their society. Another big misconception about European trade is that we invariably think other countries had to yield to the terms set forth by the Europeans.Although, Europeans had a powerful civilization and their weapons were more technology advance than many other nations, the term trade was not always in favor of the Europeans. For example, even though Portugal had a better naval and military technology, they had a very particular succeeder when trading with China and Japan. Between 1521 and 1522, Portuguese had attempted to enforce trading with China. However, their aggressive apparent movement ended with a decisive defeat of the Portuguese because they were unable to control all the maritime traffic in the region.As a result, Portugal was expelled from China in 1523. Another example was the Mughal Empire. Mughal Empire was founded in the untimely 16th century and located in the Middle East region. According to the class note, although this pudding stone was relatively new, they already had a better gunpowder technology than the Europeans. Of course, we cannot conclude that the Mughal Empire had a stronger military than the Europeans establish on this fact. However, the gunpowder technology would definitely give the Mughal people a superior defense upon an overture by the Europeans in case of a trading issue arose.As a result, we cannot conclude that a powerful civilization was a factor for the European to continue their trading network at around 1500. An underlying reason of the trade was that the Europeans treasured to be more superior. They wanted to spread their civilized cultures and religions to the less civilized countries in order to colonize them easier. The Americas was a great example to illustrate this influence. After capi tal of Ohio discovered the new continent in 1400s, European powers began to flock and colonize the new world.Despite the natives were resisting, they were presently adapted to their new dominating power. This was because many of the products that they used were imported from the European nations, including tea, clothing, religion etc. The success of the dominating European power was due to the fact that they took advantage of the trading system and method was goalless for the empires in the old world. It is because the less civilized old world countries had already established their own cultures and religions and were not ready to change.For example, Christianity did not find its way in China. Even in the mid 18th century, two hundred years after the trading relationship began only about 0. 08 percent of total Chinese race had converted from Buddhism to Christianity. Therefore, the explanation that trading system continued because of the Europeans cohesive civilization was not w ell constructed, as it was true for the countries in the new world but not the old. Finally, European nations were ore interested in products made in other countries than those countries interested in their products. An example about the Chinese empire was illustrated in the previous paragraph. China refused the purchase foreign goods because they had already a rich culture by itself. In contrast, Europeans were very interested in silk, porcelains and food produced in China. In Africa, where people could not apply European products, European powers simply arrived, enslaved, and trade those indigent people.Therefore, Europeans after 1500s continued their networks with other countries were more because they wanted to purchase foreign products rather than so sell their products. In conclusion, Europeans established ongoing trade networks in Africa, Asia and the Americas after 1500 because they wanted to trade with countries just as eager to trade with them does not sufficiently invol ve the trading landscape at that time. Some countries were uninterested in their products and some others simply cannot afford them. As a result, the statement is false and should be revised.